Home > Alternative Routes
Alternative Shipping Routes
With the Strait of Hormuz closed to commercial traffic, vessels must reroute around the Cape of Good Hope or rely on limited pipeline bypass capacity. Below is a comparison of normal transit versus Cape reroute for major shipping lanes, plus an overview of pipeline alternatives and their real-world constraints.
Route Comparison: Normal Transit vs Cape of Good Hope Reroute
| Route | Normal Transit | Cape Reroute | Extra Days | Extra Distance | Extra Cost |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ras Tanura, Saudi Arabia→Rotterdam, NetherlandsVLCC | 19d / 6,400 nm | 35d / 11,800 nm | +16d | +5,400 nm | +$500K |
| Ras Laffan, Qatar→Yokohama, JapanLNG Carrier | 16d / 6,600 nm | 38d / 13,200 nm | +22d | +6,600 nm | +$850K |
| Jebel Ali, UAE→SingaporeContainer | 7d / 3,100 nm | 28d / 10,500 nm | +21d | +7,400 nm | +$600K |
| Basra, Iraq→Shanghai, ChinaVLCC | 18d / 7,200 nm | 40d / 14,500 nm | +22d | +7,300 nm | +$900K |
| Jubail, Saudi Arabia→Rotterdam, NetherlandsContainer | 18d / 6,500 nm | 34d / 12,000 nm | +16d | +5,500 nm | +$450K |
| Jubail, Saudi Arabia→Yokohama, JapanVLCC | 16d / 6,800 nm | 38d / 13,200 nm | +22d | +6,400 nm | +$850K |
| Kuwait City, Kuwait→Mumbai, IndiaVLCC | 3d / 1,200 nm | 25d / 10,800 nm | +22d | +9,600 nm | +$400K |
| Ras Laffan, Qatar→Incheon, South KoreaLNG Carrier | 8d / 4,500 nm | 30d / 12,000 nm | +22d | +7,500 nm | +$1.2M |
| Ras Tanura, Saudi Arabia→SingaporeVLCC | 10d / 4,200 nm | 28d / 11,500 nm | +18d | +7,300 nm | +$650K |
| Jubail, Saudi Arabia→Jamnagar, IndiaVLCC | 4d / 1,500 nm | 26d / 11,000 nm | +22d | +9,500 nm | +$500K |
| Kharg Island, Iran→Ningbo, ChinaVLCC | 17d / 6,900 nm | 39d / 14,200 nm | +22d | +7,300 nm | +$880K |
Ras Tanura, Saudi Arabia → Rotterdam, Netherlands
VLCC
Ras Laffan, Qatar → Yokohama, Japan
LNG Carrier
Jebel Ali, UAE → Singapore
Container
Basra, Iraq → Shanghai, China
VLCC
Jubail, Saudi Arabia → Rotterdam, Netherlands
Container
Jubail, Saudi Arabia → Yokohama, Japan
VLCC
Kuwait City, Kuwait → Mumbai, India
VLCC
Ras Laffan, Qatar → Incheon, South Korea
LNG Carrier
Ras Tanura, Saudi Arabia → Singapore
VLCC
Jubail, Saudi Arabia → Jamnagar, India
VLCC
Kharg Island, Iran → Ningbo, China
VLCC
Distances are approximate great-circle-based routing estimates. Cost figures reflect average VLCC/LNG carrier operating costs and bunker fuel prices at current levels. Actual costs vary by vessel type, speed, fuel prices, and charter rates.
Pipeline Bypass Capacity
Three pipeline systems can move crude oil out of the Gulf region without transiting the Strait of Hormuz. Combined theoretical capacity is roughly 7-8 million barrels per day, but operational throughput is significantly lower. For context, approximately 20 million barrels per day normally transit the strait.
East-West Pipeline (Petroline)
OperationalSaudi Arabia's primary bypass option. Originally built in the 1980s with a design capacity of 5 million barrels per day. In recent decades, parts of the pipeline have been repurposed for natural gas liquids transport, reducing effective crude oil throughput to an estimated 2.5-3.5 million barrels per day. Full restoration to nameplate capacity would require weeks of re-commissioning. Terminates at Yanbu on the Red Sea coast, allowing tankers to bypass the Strait of Hormuz entirely.
Abu Dhabi Crude Oil Pipeline (ADCOP)
Partially DisruptedCompleted in 2012 to give the UAE a Hormuz bypass. Capacity is 1.5 million barrels per day — roughly half of UAE daily exports. Connects the Habshan oil field complex inland to the port of Fujairah on the Gulf of Oman coast, east of the Strait. In the current disruption, Fujairah port operations have been intermittently affected, limiting the pipeline's practical value even though the pipeline infrastructure itself remains intact.
Iraq-Turkey Pipeline (Kirkuk-Ceyhan)
Reduced CapacityA twin pipeline system with a combined design capacity of 1.6 million barrels per day, but actual throughput has been limited to approximately 0.5 million barrels per day due to years of infrastructure degradation and intermittent shutdowns. The pipeline has been offline for extended periods and requires negotiation between the Kurdistan Regional Government, Iraq's federal government, and Turkey. Even at full capacity, it can only handle a fraction of Iraq's 4.5 million barrel per day production. Terminates at Ceyhan on the Turkish Mediterranean coast.
Key limitation: Even if all three pipelines operated at full nameplate capacity simultaneously (approximately 8.1M bbl/day), they could replace less than half of the roughly 20M bbl/day that normally transits the Strait of Hormuz. In practice, current combined operational throughput is estimated at 3.5-5.5M bbl/day. Pipelines also cannot carry LNG, containerized goods, or other non-crude commodities.
Cape of Good Hope Capacity Analysis
With Hormuz closed, virtually all Gulf-origin shipping must reroute around the southern tip of Africa. But can the Cape route absorb the full volume? The short answer: not without significant friction.
Fleet Utilization & Vessel Availability
The Cape reroute adds 10-22 extra sailing days per voyage depending on origin and destination. This means each vessel completes fewer round trips per year, effectively shrinking available fleet capacity by 15-25%. With approximately 2,500 vessels already trapped inside the Gulf and unable to trade, global effective fleet capacity is under severe pressure. Charter rates for VLCCs have surged to record levels above $400,000 per day.
Port Congestion at Key Cape Route Waypoints
Ports along the Cape route — particularly Durban, Cape Town, and Las Palmas — are experiencing congestion from the surge in vessel traffic. Bunkering (refueling) capacity at these ports was not designed for the current volume. Waiting times for fuel and provisions have increased, adding further delays on top of the longer sailing distance.
Impact on Suez Canal Traffic
The Hormuz closure has reduced Suez Canal transit volumes because Gulf-origin cargoes that would normally pass through Suez on the westbound leg are now routed around Africa instead. Suez Canal Authority revenue has declined as a result. However, some vessels that previously used the Suez-Hormuz corridor are now taking the longer Suez-to-Cape hybrid routing for non-Gulf cargoes, creating unusual traffic patterns.
Precedent: 2024 Red Sea Rerouting
During the 2023-24 Red Sea shipping disruption, approximately 60% of container traffic that normally used the Suez Canal rerouted via the Cape of Good Hope. That disruption caused container freight rates to triple on affected lanes and added 10-14 days to Asia-Europe transit times. The current Hormuz closure is significantly larger in scale: it affects crude oil and LNG volumes (not just containers), involves a far higher proportion of global energy trade, and has removed roughly 20 million barrels per day of oil flow from its normal routing — compared to zero oil disruption in the Red Sea scenario.
Summary
The Cape of Good Hope is not a bottleneck in the way that Hormuz or Suez are — it is open ocean with no canal capacity limit. The constraints are instead logistical: longer voyages absorb more fleet capacity, bunkering ports become congested, and the global vessel fleet simply does not have enough ships to maintain the same cargo throughput when every voyage takes 50-150% longer. The result is higher freight costs, extended delivery times, and a structural supply shortfall that pipelines cannot fully offset.
Route distances and transit times are approximate, based on standard commercial shipping route databases. Cost estimates assume average VLCC operating costs at current bunker fuel prices. Pipeline capacities sourced from EIA, IEA, and operator disclosures. All figures are for informational purposes and may differ from actual commercial terms.